Mid3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Mid3 - Essay Example This was swiftly followed by the addition of Florida as a slave state (Brinkley, 440). Additionally, the US-Mexican war was potentially provoked during Polk’s presidency, as they were already annoyed by the annexation of Texas. He was also interested in purchasing Baja California and New Mexico, which was seen as an insult and the Mexicans felt disarmed by this new president and his choices (Brinkley, 443). Polk himself provoked the war, using the new Texas-Mexico border as justification. The US-Mexican war was another provocation towards disunion because many of those living in the Southern states and former Mexican territories were in support of the war, but those living in the north felt it to be unnecessary. Ulysses S. Grant felt the war to be immoral, which suggests the position of many of the Northern Whigs. At the time, there was mounting tension about a number of issues in the U.S. which eventually led to a break-up of the Union between 1848 and 1861. Slavery was a gro wing concern, with many slave-owning states being concerned about the lack of economic security that would come from abolition, and those in the north feeling slave ownership to be immoral. Millard Fillmore became the last Whig president. Fillmore hated slavery but enforced the new Fugitive Slave Law, which meant that many African Americans were being arrested and had to escape to Canada to escape slavery (Brinkley, 425). The Whig party was also affected by many of the developments at the time, as they felt offended by the compromise of 1850, and there was a divide in the presidential candidate backed by Southern Whigs and Northern Whigs. This dissent in the party ranks eventually led to the dissolution of the Whig party, and is the reason why Millard Fillmore was the last Whig president. Additionally, Pierce was elected President by the majority but is widely acknowledged to be one of the worst U.S. presidents in history (Brinkley, 424). He attempted to save the Union by backing pr o-slavery sentiments, which makes him unusual for a Yankee. He signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act drafted by Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas, allowing the people of all Western Territories to vote whether or not to permit slavery (Brinkley, 426). This meant that there could be a change in the divide between pro- and anti-slavery states in the United States, starting a period of intense turmoil. It is important to note that slavery was not the only important aspect of the break-up of the Union, but is a major contributing factor to a number of problems that were occurring across the new continental United States, which was growing in size. Part TWO: The Civil War: In what way did the Confederacy embody Calhoun’s version of Jeffersonianism? In what way did the Union under Lincoln embody the Whig/Republican version of Hamiltonianism? How did Lincoln turn the war into a Second American Revolution? Why were Antietam, Vicksburg, Gettysburg and the election of 1864 important? How and w hy did the Union eventually prevail? The Confederacy was born out of several states, started by South Carolina in 1860, declaring their independence from the United States as it was (Brinkley, 451). There were several issues that led to this disillusion, one of which being slavery. The Confederacy can be said to embody Calhoun’s version of Jeffersonianism by promoting minimal government, preventing the use of tariffs and funding public works. This is in stark contrast to Hamiltonianism and many of the elements of the United

Historical and Cultural Perspectives of Luxury, with example of Luxury Essay

Historical and Cultural Perspectives of Luxury, with example of Luxury phenomenn in Russia - Essay Example The standard meaning of essential necessities will incorporate nourishment, abiding, and apparel. Needs, dissimilar to needs, are goal or widespread. Needs, dissimilar to needs, are deliberate. Uneven longings are voracious. (Friedman.V., 2012) Why an endeavor to look upon luxury from a recorded viewpoint? Firstly, by investigating how distinctive social orders in diverse times of our history managed luxury, we can get closer to what it truly remains for and its associations with different ideas, for example, riches, power, et cetera. Besides, an in-profundity recorded point of view will additionally furnish us with important bits of knowledge into majority rules system, patriotism, social amicability, human qualities, and relationship to God, and different parts of the human social and financial life. Thirdly, such an undertaking will call attention to the way that all around history, very nearly all endeavors to control individuals penchant to luxury neglected to do along these lines, which demonstrates to us obviously that such confinements today are well on the way to fall flat too. All around the historical backdrop of humankind luxury has been a steady component in the lives of people and in the works of savants, writers, legislators, economists. Luxury has been nearly inspected in perspective of providing for it a legitimate definition, discovering its implications and attributes, its roots, reasons and outcomes. Yet none of the numerous endeavors to do so can brag an exhaustive investigation of this matter. In its development in time, luxury has been both commended and censured, there were times when its indications were empowered or despite what might be expected disheartened. A certain vicinity of luxury in the human soul dated as once again as the third thousand years BC. At the same time for such a variety of hundreds of years it has been connected with the idea of riches, both being discerned as